🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."