🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.